Impact of COVID-19 on cancer care in India: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health-care systems, leading to concerns about its subsequent impact on non-COVID disease conditions. The diagnosis and management of cancer is time sensitive and is likely to be substantially affected by these disruptions. We aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care in India. METHODS: We did an ambidirectional cohort study at 41 cancer centres across India that were members of the National Cancer Grid of India to compare provision of oncology services between March 1 and May 31, 2020, with the same time period in 2019. We collected data on new patient registrations, number of patients visiting outpatient clinics, hospital admissions, day care admissions for chemotherapy, minor and major surgeries, patients accessing radiotherapy, diagnostic tests done (pathology reports, CT scans, MRI scans), and palliative care referrals. We also obtained estimates from participating centres on cancer screening, research, and educational activities (teaching of postgraduate students and trainees). We calculated proportional reductions in the provision of oncology services in 2020, compared with 2019. FINDINGS: Between March 1 and May 31, 2020, the number of new patients registered decreased from 112 270 to 51 760 (54% reduction), patients who had follow-up visits decreased from 634 745 to 340 984 (46% reduction), hospital admissions decreased from 88 801 to 56 885 (36% reduction), outpatient chemotherapy decreased from 173634 to 109 107 (37% reduction), the number of major surgeries decreased from 17 120 to 8677 (49% reduction), minor surgeries from 18 004 to 8630 (52% reduction), patients accessing radiotherapy from 51 142 to 39 365 (23% reduction), pathological diagnostic tests from 398 373 to 246 616 (38% reduction), number of radiological diagnostic tests from 93 449 to 53 560 (43% reduction), and palliative care referrals from 19 474 to 13 890 (29% reduction). These reductions were even more marked between April and May, 2020. Cancer screening was stopped completely or was functioning at less than 25% of usual capacity at more than 70% of centres during these months. Reductions in the provision of oncology services were higher for centres in tier 1 cities (larger cities) than tier 2 and 3 cities (smaller cities). INTERPRETATION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had considerable impact on the delivery of oncology services in India. The long-term impact of cessation of cancer screening and delayed hospital visits on cancer stage migration and outcomes are likely to be substantial. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the Hindi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Real World Experience of Treating Neuroblastoma: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India.

OBJECTIVES: Management of neuroblastoma, especially high-risk (HR) disease is difficult in a resource-limited setting. There is a paucity of literature on outcomes of patients treated in India. The present study was conducted to analyse the clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with neuroblastoma treated at authors' centre between 2000 to 2017. The International Neuroblastoma Staging System and risk grouping were used to classify patients as low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR). Treatment was individualised and risk-adapted. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study included 85 patients with a median age of 4 y and 67% were males. Malnutrition was observed in 55% of patients. Adrenal gland was the most common site in 75% patients followed by mediastinum in 12%. LR was observed in 7/85 (8%) patients, IR 20/85 (24%) and HR in 58/85 (68%) patients. The CCG-3891 protocol was used to treat 80% of the patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed in 32% of HR patients. The median follow-up was 16.6 mo. The median EFS and OS for all patients were 19.2 mo and 26.9 mo respectively and the 3 y EFS and OS was 36% and 47% respectively. The 3y EFS for LR, IR and HR patients was 100%, 54%, and 18.9% respectively (P < 0.001) and for OS was 100%, 77%, and 34% respectively (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, a hemoglobin less than 10 g% predicted inferior EFS (P = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.005) for all patients. For patients with high-risk disease, on multivariate analysis, hemoglobin (P = 0.002) and 13-Cis Retinoic acid maintenance (P = 0.002) predicted EFS and only radiotherapy to the primary (P = 0.01) predicted OS. Only 4/19 (21%) are alive and in remission post ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of patients with neuroblastoma presented to authors' centre with advanced disease. Survival outcomes of patients with LR disease are excellent. However, patients with HR disease have poor outcomes despite multimodality management. Non-availability of N-MYC testing in few patients could have falsely down-staged them to IR from HR. A low hemoglobin at diagnosis is a poor predictor of outcome.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced resectable carcinoma of the esophagus: A single-center experience from India with a brief review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The management of locally advanced carcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction has undergone a major evolution over the past two decades with the widespread use of combined modality therapy. Although many Indian centers practice the combined modality therapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), published data are sparse. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to study the safety and efficacy of nCRT in patients with locally advanced resectable carcinoma of the esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective single-arm study of the first fifty patients enrolled over 3 years (2014-2016). RESULTS: The median age was 51 years (M:F = 3:2), 90% of the patients had squamous cell carcinomas, and 69% had lower-third lesions. All accrued patients completed the intended dose of radiation; however, approximately 20% had a treatment delay, which was duly gap corrected. Importantly, there were no treatment-related toxic deaths. Eleven patients could not undergo surgery following nCRT (two patients defaulted, two were deemed medically unfit, and seven (14%) patients had disease progression on imaging). Thirty-nine (78%) patients were planned for definitive surgery; however, a further 7 (14%) were found to be inoperable intraoperatively. Thirty-two patients successfully completed their definitive surgical procedures with R0 resections, of which 19 patients (38%) had a pathological complete response (pCR). There was no postoperative 90-day mortality in our study cohort. Analysis of prognostic factors that predicted a response showed that patients who had adenocarcinoma and with circumferential lesions responded poorly. CONCLUSION: nCRT appears to be a safe and a reasonably well-tolerated option in carefully selected patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancers. Although our data are not mature to analyze the survival outcomes with a pCR rate of 38%, it suggests nCRT to be a promising option in the management of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancers.

Pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Experience from a tertiary cancer center in India.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPCs) are rare tumors. There is paucity of data on outcomes in pediatric NPC from developing countries. AIM: The present study was conducted to ascertain the outcomes of children with NPC at our center. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of case records of pediatric NPC patients treated at our hospital was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of 37 consecutive patients <18 years of age with pediatric NPC treated between 2000 and 2015. Patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or CTRT with cisplatin, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, and log rank test was used to compare variables. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 36.6 months. The median age of the patients was 15 years, and 22/37 (59%) patients were male. The most common presenting complaint was neck mass (70%), followed by nasal bleeding (16%). The distribution of Stage I, II, III, and IV patients was 1/37 (3%), 2/37 (6%), 13/37 (35%), and 21/37 (57%), respectively. Distant metastasis at presentation was seen in 3/37 patients. Complete response was seen in 32/37 (86%) patients. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) for the entire cohort of patients was 60.1%. No significant difference in EFS was observed with age, gender, stage, use of 5-FU with CTRT, and nutritional status. CONCLUSION: Majority of patients with pediatric NPC present with advanced stage disease at our center. No difference in outcomes was seen with the two schedules of CTRT. Local control could be achieved in majority of patients; however, distant metastasis was the most common reason for relapse.

Evolution in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer: the experience of Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a retrospective analysis of disease free survival (DFS) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in relation to evolution of treatment and related factors. METHODS: A total of 3,892 cases of LACC treated at the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India, during 1990-1999 were analyzed. Management of LACC including concurrent chemo-radiation (CCRT) has evolved through trials conducted at the institute. DFS and risk of second cancer were elicited using actuarial and Kaplan-Meier methods, respectively. RESULTS: A majority belonged to stage III (54%) and complete follow-up at 5-years was 90%. DFS at 5, 10 and 15-years were 58%, 49% and 42% for stage IIB and 43%, 35% and 31% for stage III, respectively. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone as treatment modality reported the poorest 5-year DFS (37%). Addition of chemotherapy to EBRT resulted in marginal increase in survival (41%) but inclusion of brachytherapy to EBRT enhanced survival (58%) significantly (p<0.001). CCRT with brachytherapy as a planned component resulted in the best DFS (69%), irrespective of disease stage. In a carefully selected group of patients who were suitable for salvage surgery, the long-term DFS was 71%, 63% and 63% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, for stages IIB and III together. Complete response was achieved in 67% and 15% of them recurred. Remote metastasis occurred in 13%. The cumulative risk of developing any second cancer was 0.5% at 5 years, 1.9% at 10 years and 2.8% at 15 years of follow up. CONCLUSION: Our data indicates satisfactory treatment outcome even in advanced disease and with the present state of knowledge, the recommended standard treatment for LACC is careful pre-treatment evaluation followed by CCRT which includes brachytherapy.